Assignment #1- Evaluating a Program Evaluation
After I
spent a good deal of time finding a program evaluation that I was interested in
and was not too complicated; I came across an Employee Wellness Program
Evaluation Report. This was a report put together by the University of Maine
for the Maine Department of Transportation. The department had started a
wellness program for its employees and they wanted to make sure that the
program was worthwhile. The driving factor of Maine Department of
Transportation (DOT) was to decrease productivity loss due to sickness, absenteeism
and injuries. The DOT was also interested in developing minimum fitness
standards for each position and then taking steps to ensure that its employees
were able to meet those minimum requirements. The wellness program was started in 2004 and
in 2008 the Maine DOT wanted to create a more detailed evaluation program to better
determine the cost/ benefits of the program and to expand the program so it
could be used throughout the state.
The
evaluators were looking at both short-term and long-term outcomes. The
short-term outcomes focused on increasing the participation level among
employees, increasing physical activity and healthy eating habits and
decreasing the amount of substance abuse. All of these short-term outcomes
would lead to a decrease in illness and injuries. Measuring these short term
outcomes will be done by monitoring vital signs (blood pressure, weight, etc),
collecting workers compensation and health claims and monitoring health risk
scores. In addition to these, employee satisfaction levels and goals would be
determined using employee surveys. The evaluators found generally that the
program was working well. More money was being saved than was being spent on
the program, lost time due to injuries was drastically reduced and
participation was increased from 40% to over 60%. The long term outcomes
focused on creating a safe and injury free work environment but there had not
been enough time to really study the full effect on long term outcomes.
The evaluation of this program is summative as
it is meant to provide feedback of the current program in order to make
improvements allowing the program to expand. In my view summative evaluations
are an important part of any program as it critically examines the program and
is an effective way to bring forth needed changes to improve. The evaluators used an outcome based method of evaluation. First the evaluators determined
what the desired outcomes of the program were, analyzed the data collected for
each outcome, and finally made recommendations specific to that outcome.
I think that the evaluation of the employee wellness
program was very well done. The outcomes were described thoroughly and it was
made very clear where the data to measure it came from and how it was used. The
evaluators also provided detailed findings and recommendations specific to that
outcome. This made the report very user friendly and ensured that each outcome
was covered in detail. I also liked the fact that the evaluators would critique
the data used and would provide suggestions as to how to improve the type of
data that was collected for that specific outcome in order to improve future
evaluations. Some of the weaknesses of the evaluation were that the language
was fairly technical in some parts. Also
it was hard for the average person to follow what they were comparing. At times
they were comparing the 2008 data to the 2004 data and other times the workers
would be compared to the overall state’s data but it didn't specify where that
data come from or who was included in it. There are also a few instances where
it is unclear how they obtained certain data, such as for vital signs, was it
by a doctor or simply part of the employee survey. Overall I believe that the evaluation
provides solid recommendations that would easily allow improvements to be made
and to allow other regions to implement this program.
I forgot to include the link to the evaluation: http://www.maine.gov/mdot/tr/documents/pdf/report0803final.pdf
ReplyDeleteInteresting choice Teresa. You share a clearly stated goal of the program which is always a big help when reviewing the purpose of the PE. Identifying long and short term goals is also the sign of a well conducted PE. I wonder if the employees were mandated to participate in the program. The issue with summative and formative is sometimes hard to discern. I agree that they want to find out if the program is working but I am curious to know if in the future they use the material to revised the existing program.
ReplyDeleteGreat work.
Jay