So I have been having some troubles posting new posts to my blog, it acts like it should be loading but it all I get is a blank screen. I gave up last night and tried with a refreshed mind this morning, even though it should have been done yesterday- opps. I jumped outside of my knowledge box and took the plunge into using google docs as Bill and J.R had talked about using it to post in class. I have to say that I learned a lot and I will likely start to regularly use it, I didn't know how useful it could be! That being said I'll need to see if my link actually works or if I need to go back and do more research. Here it is, see below for the link- fingers crossed.
Logic Model- Outdoor Education
Now to create my survey :)
Sunday, February 10, 2013
Saturday, February 9, 2013
Assignment #3- Planning a Program Evaluation
Outdoor Education
Engage Stakeholders
Who should be involved?
The Outdoor education teachers, administrators, participating students at Delisle Composite School will be involved in the
assessment and the general community including parents will also be informed of the results.
How might they be engaged?
Staff and students and will reflect on the
program through survey questions, interviews, and observations. Students
will also be involved through summative evaluation by comparing final exam
answers with non-participants and interviews of selected students.
Focus on the Evaluation
What are you going to evaluate? Describe
program (logic model)
The plan is to evaluate the:
-effectiveness of student learning in Biology 20
and Physical Education 20
-level of student engagement and satisfaction
Delisle Composite School (DCS) serves 230
students from grade 7 to grade 12. The school is part of the Prairie Spirit
School Division. The student population in the school has been decreasing
in recent years due to the influx of students choosing to attend Saskatoon high
schools. As a way to entice students to keep attending school in Delisle, a
number of interesting programs have been created. It is the hope that these
programs will increase student engagement and will help DCS compete with the
course offerings of bigger city schools.
The outdoor education program combines
physical education 20 and biology 20 together which helps to increase the hands
on perspective of biology 20. The phys. ed. portion of the course is easily
incorporated through biking, snowshoeing, canoeing, hiking and other
activities. The biology portion is typically hands on projects and activities
such as pond dipping, collecting samples and making observations. This
knowledge is supplemented by some coursework and research which helps to occupy
any days where weather does not permit students to be outdoors. This is a unique course as it allows students to enter into the community and use the resources that are available around them. Therefore strong community relationships need to be forged allowing students access to resources such as the golf course and continuing funding that the program receives from local businesses.
What is the purpose of this evaluation?
This is a formative and summative assessment
with the intent of identifying the effectiveness of the outdoor education program
and to identify ways to improve the program by making any adjustments that are
needed to make the program more effective.
Who will the use the evaluation? How will they
use it?
Who/users
|
How will they use the information?
|
Outdoor Education Teacher
|
Results can be used to ensure that the
teacher is delivering adequate knowledge in both subject areas as well as
engaging students with a positive educational experience. Results will also
help guide the teacher if changes need to be made.
|
Administrators
|
Information from the evaluation will be used
to improve the program and to gauge budget needs.
|
Staff
|
Results and conclusions from the program
evaluation will be shared with all staff members to increase staff knowledge
of school programs.
|
Community
|
Results from the evaluation will be shared
with the community, in order to build relationships and ensure contributing businesses that their funding is being well used.
|
Parents
|
Results from the evaluation will be shared
with parents, who will hopefully endorse the program and spread the word
through the community
|
What questions will the
evaluation answer?
How does Outdoor Education affect
student engagement?
How does Outdoor Education affect
student learning?
Do parents see benefits to
Outdoor Education?
Is the teacher utilizing instructional
time efficiently?
Are students performing as well
on final exam questions?
Are resources being used to their
potential?
Are the existing
resources adequate enough?
What information do you need to answer the questions?
What I wish to
know
|
Indicators – How
will I know it?
|
Does Outdoor Ed. affect student engagement?
Is the teacher using time efficiently?
|
Observation and student surveys in both the
outdoor education classes and traditional classes
|
Are students obtaining the same knowledge as
those in traditional classes?
Are students preforming as well on final
exam questions?
|
Compare marks between the traditional and
outdoor education classes.
|
Do parents see benefits to the program?
|
Survey given to the parents
|
Are resources adequate and being well used?
|
Interview outdoor education teacher and
administration
|
When is the evaluation needed?
The evaluation would be carried
out throughout the semester and would be finished by the end of the year on June
30. This would give the evaluator time to compare final exam results, compile
student and parent surveys and complete the necessary interviews.
What evaluation design will I use?
The evaluation will be both
formative and summative. It is formative since the research will be
on-going during the semester and summative since there will be data collected
at the end of the year and any changes or modifications would not be made until
the evaluation was complete. The evaluation will be goals-based using a CIPP
model.
Collect the information
What sources of information will you use?
People: Administration, teachers, students and parents
Pictorial records and observations: Administrative observations and teacher observations
What data collection method(s) will you use?
·
Surveys
(Before and after)
·
Interview
(After)
·
Observation
(During)
·
Marks
on final exams (After)
Focus Group (During)
Focus Group (During)
Instrumentation:
What is needed to record the information?
- Surveys: design questions; distribute surveys by
email to parents, and handouts to students; collect and organize results
- Interviews: choose a random
sample of students to answer questions, create questions, schedule interviews
at the end of the course
- Observations: general document – to be done throughout term
(beginning, middle, end)
- Focus Group: design questions; invite participants; record conversation
When will you collect
data for each method you’ve chosen?
Method
|
Before program
|
During program
|
Immediately after
|
Later
|
Surveys
|
X
|
X
|
||
Interviews
|
X
|
|||
Data (marks)
|
X
|
|||
Observation
Focus Group |
X
X |
Will a sample be used?
No
Analyze and Interpret
How will the data be analyzed and what methods
will be used?
·
Surveys: interpret and compile information (evaluator)
·
Interviews and focus group: interpret, compare and compile information
(evaluator)
·
Observations: compile and compare 3 sets of observations (teacher,
admin., evaluator)
·
Data (marks): compile and compare marks from final exams between two
groups of students
How will the information be interpreted-by whom?
The Evaluator will be responsible for
analyzing data. The administration and outdoor ed. teacher will then have
the opportunity to be brought into discussion and participate in discussion and
allow for their interpretations to be included.
What did you learn? What are the
limitations?
- · Since the evaluator is an internal member of staff there will need to be some care taken when analyzing data and making judgements on the program.
- · There would also be some time constraints on getting all the data collected between the final exam and the end of the year when marks are distributed.
- · The evaluator needs to consider any variations between the traditional classrooms and the outdoor education groups; some years the demand for the program requires that students get ‘accepted’ into the program
Use the information
How will the evaluation be communicated and shared?
The evaluation will
be analyzed and complied into a report that will then be shared with administration
and the outdoor education teacher.
What are the next steps?
Together the
administration, teacher and evaluator will create a brief statement of the
results and any changes that may be implemented in the future. This can be
shared with other stakeholders whenever it will be possible.
Manage the evaluation
Human subject’s protection
Surveys will be done anonymously by students
and parents. This will allow for participants to answer questions
truthfully. The data collected will have all names and identification removed
before the report is made.
Management chart
The evaluator will create a gantt chart (used
to schedule complex schedules) and share it with administrators.
Timeline
·
January:
complete all preparatory evaluation work, prepare surveys and interview
questions
·
February:
conduct pre surveys and do observations
·
March/April:
analyze pre-survey results, complete another observation
·
May: begin
conducting interviews of teacher and administration, distribute parent surveys; conduct student focus group
·
June: distribute, conduct and analyze post surveys; collect and
analyze final exam data; prepare report and meet with administrator and teacher
to finalize report and add in improvements
Responsibilities
The evaluator is responsible for creating all
survey and interview questions. In addition they will need to distribute
surveys, set up interviews, analyze and summarize the results and create a
report to share with administration and the teacher. Collaboratively, a list of recommendations
will be compiled and included in a brief report that will be shared with the
shareholders. The teacher will be responsible for making the final exam and
collecting them for the evaluator afterwards.
Budget
All devices and materials required are located
internally and therefore, the fees included would be any expenses incurred by
the evaluator.
Standards
Utility
Evaluation of the program will be used to make
improvements to the program and to evaluate the program effectiveness.
Feasibility
The outdoor education classes tend to be quite
small so the evaluation should be manageable. The most difficult part would be
in June when a lot needs to be accomplished and schools are at their busiest, however the interviews and focus group could be conducted in May to help ease this time constraint.
If necessary, arrangements could be made to extend the deadline if all the
parties involved will agree to it.
Propriety
There would have to be an element of trust from
the very onset of the evaluation so all parties are respected in all steps of
the evaluation.
Accuracy
The evaluation is looking at specific goals
and outcomes and should be accurate due to this concentrated focus of the
evaluation.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)